Via-Town Hall
Thomas Sowell
Some media pundits see in the growing proportion of non-white groups in the population a growing opposition to the Republican Party that will sooner or later make it virtually impossible for Republicans to win presidential elections or even to control either house of Congress. But is demography destiny?
Conventional wisdom in the Republican establishment is that what the GOP needs to do, in order to win black votes or Hispanic votes, is to craft policies specifically targeting these groups. In other words, Republicans need to become more like Democrats.
Whether in a racial context or in other contexts, the supposed need for Republicans to become more like Democrats has long been a recurring theme of the moderate Republican establishment, going back more than half a century.
Yet the most successful Republican presidential candidate during that long period was a man who went completely counter to that conventional wisdom-- namely, Ronald Reagan, who won back to back landslide election victories.
Meanwhile, moderate Republican presidential candidate after moderate Republican presidential candidate has gone down to defeat, even against Democratic presidential candidates who were unpopular (Harry Truman), previously unknown (Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton) or who had a terrible economic track record (Barack Obama).
None of this seems to have caused any second thoughts in the Republican establishment. So long as that remains the case, demography may indeed be destiny-- and that destiny could be Democratic administrations as far out as the eye can see.
If non-white voters can only be gotten by pandering to them with goodies earmarked for them, then Republicans are doomed, even if they choose to go that route. Why should anyone who wants racially earmarked goodies vote for Republicans, when the Democrats already have a track record of delivering such goodies?
An alternative way to make inroads into the overwhelming majority of minority votes for Democrats would be for the Republicans to articulate a coherent case for their principles and the benefits that those principles offer to all Americans.
But the Republicans' greatest failure has been precisely their chronic failure to spell out their principles-- and the track record of those principles-- to either white or non-white voters.
Very few people know, for example, that the gap between black and white incomes narrowed during the Reagan administration and widened during the Obama administration. This was not because of Republican policies designed specifically for blacks, but because free market policies create an economy in which all people can improve their economic situation.
Conversely, few policies have had such a devastating effect on the job opportunities of minority youths as minimum wage laws, which are usually pushed by Democrats and opposed by Republicans. But these facts do not "speak for themselves." Somebody has to cite the facts and take the trouble to show why unemployment among minority youths skyrocketed when minimum wage increases priced them out of jobs.
The loss of income from an entry-level job is only part of the loss sustained by minority young people. Work experience at even an entry-level job is a valuable asset, as a stepping stone to progressively higher level jobs. Moreover, nobody gains from having a huge number of idle youths hanging out on the streets, least of all minority communities.
Labor unions push minimum wage laws to insulate their members from the competition of younger workers, and Democratic politicians are heavily dependent on union support. For the same reason, Democrats have to go along with teachers' unions that treat schools as places to guarantee their members jobs, rather than to provide the quality education so much needed to rise out of poverty.
What Democrats cannot say under these conditions is what Republicans are free to say-- even if Republicans have seldom taken advantage of that freedom to make inroads into minority voting blocs. Inroads are all they need. If the black vote for Democrats falls to 70 percent, the Democrats are in deep trouble.
But if Republicans continue inarticulate, then it is they who are in big trouble. More important, so is the country.
Thats all well and fine Mr Sowell. But just how do we do that.
ReplyDeleteI think we should start yesterday to do a go around the media.
For instance we should start airing 3min commercials in blue cities.Explaining how our policies help them. Make them city specific.
For example: When a factory or business shuts down in a town. Blast it across the region and explain why it happened and why the Conservative way "could" have prevented it.
Second among many. Change the debate format and the narrators! For Gods sake why in the heck do we keep subjecting ourselves to that crud fest!
And I say narrators on purpose!
And three.
Get newt Gingrich(or someone dastardly and learned) in an isolated room with a few Conservative 2010 ers and build a coup against speaker Bonner and the establishment Repubicans.
And lastly get our arses into the schools,and do it quickly. If we have to recruit under the radar conservatives to go in under lying by omission pretenses then so be it.
You know someone like a local businessman that the community depends on. Someone not normally vocal. Have him go in and talk about apprenticeship or senior resumes before graduation.Have him sneak in things like a wealthier populace can afford to be green. How he promotes from within in a rather rapid pace. How he contributed to the comunity that directly helped the parents and students he is talking to.
My Goodness thats what hamas does. Dont you think we can do it? For goodness sake we dont send children out to blow themselves up. So we should have an advantage.
Spathy is bloviating from the hip here. So take it for what it is. But it sure sounds better than becoming Socialist lite! Or the other Statist.