Tip Jar

Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts

7/22/2020

AS SEEN ON TWITTER 7/22/2020







8/07/2018

The Mossad Ran a Fake Diving Resort for Tourists in Sudan. This Is the Incredible Story Behind It

The Mossad ran a fake diving resort for tourists in Sudan. This is the incredible story behind it

One of the Israeli intelligence agency's most daring missions is being turned into a movie, 'Red Sea Diving Resort.' One of the operatives looks back on a breathtaking operation that saved thousands of Ethiopian Jews' lives in the 1980s

1/01/2018

Israeli archaeologists find 2,700-year-old 'governor of Jerusalem' seal impression

Via-REUTERS

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israeli archaeologists unveiled on Monday a 2,700-year-old clay seal impression which they said belonged to a biblical governor of Jerusalem.




12/05/2012

What a ‘Truce’ Means to Hamas

Via-Front Page Magazine

By Joseph Puder

Disparate reflections on the recently concluded ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, which followed eight days of fighting, were revealed in a November 23, 2012 New York Times report: “Palestinians erupted in triumphant celebrations here on Thursday, vowing new unity among rival factions and a renewed commitment to the tactic of resistance, while Israel’s leaders sought to soberly sell the achievements of their latest military operation to a domestic audience long skeptical of cease-fire deals like the one announced the night before.”

Hamas held boisterous rallies across the Gaza Strip the day after the Egyptian-brokered cease-fire with Israel went into effect, in spite of having lost 161 fighters and civilians, and being left with pulverized weapon stores and destroyed smuggling tunnels. According to CBS-News, “Gaza’s Hamas rulers claimed that Israel’s decision not to send in ground troops, as it had four years ago, was a sign of a new deterrent power.” Hamas’ Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, boasted that the “Resistance fighters changed the rules of the game with the occupation (Israel) and upset its calculations. The option of invading Gaza after this victory is gone and will never return.” Haniyeh pointed out that “Resistance can unite our people and bring us independence.” And he added, “The blood of Jabari [the terror master and so-called Hamas Chief-of-Staff killed by Israel] united the people of the nation on the choice of jihad and resistance.”

Unlike their political leaders, most of the Israeli public is cognizant of the nature of ceasefire agreements with Arab terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah. They know that agreements mean very little beyond a respite in the fighting, and that as soon as Hamas manages to restore its depleted missile arsenal, the firing of rockets against Israel will resume.

Read entire article

11/23/2012

Just A Thought


On the recent Israel/Hamas dust up

One reason that I believe that the world is heading head first into a period of utter chaos is how far we have veered away from logic and reason when it comes to the basics of.... well logic and reason.

I understand the reason that this has come to pass, the leftist/progressive intellectual/ media complex has so corrupted society with false narratives to promote their agendas that truth is no longer  a necessary ingredient in forming public opinion.

I could write volumes on this deception but the problem at its core is that far too few people care about truth when forming their judgement anymore, false narratives are far easier and easier to digest.

Take the recent dust up between Israel and Hamas, right there is something that was lost in the false narrative, it was Israel versus Hamas not Israel versus the Palestinian people. It was a vibrant health democratic nation state defending itself
from a recognized terrorist groups attack on its sovereign territory. That is truth, though you would be hard pressed to hear it expressed so simply in all the commentary about it.

Consider how far we have traveled down the road towards chaos when the Israel Prime Minister has to actually thank the American President for recognizing "Israel’s need to defend itself, and Israel’s right to defend itself." A terrorist organization that as a plank in its charter calls for the destruction of Israel, uses missiles provided by Iran to wantonly attack innocent Israeli citizens is instead portrayed as the victim by a corrupt and lying media complex.

I have read no better summary of the culmination of this distortion than by David Goldman when he points out the obvious
It is astonishing that American officials and the world media have hailed Morsi simply because he first sicced his dog on his neighbor, and then called the dog off.
This sort of distortion of reality and the defense of evil can not go on indefinitely without dire consequences to a stable societal structure. If the world's leaders and "opinion makers" continue to promote agendas that are so diametrically opposed to truth, dark days lie ahead-

Truth Matters


10/18/2010

Israel Behind Iran’s Computer Worm?


Via-Human Events

by James Zumwalt

As Iran awaited delivery of nuclear fuel at its Bushehr facility in late August, all eyes were upon Israel. In two previous attempts by Middle East countries unfriendly to Israel to develop a nuclear capability, the Israelis never allowed development of a facility to get that far. In both the case of Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007, Israel initiated decisive military strikes to destroy them before nuclear fuel could be transferred.

This deadline, self-imposed by Israel, was to avoid the risk during a strike of releasing nuclear radiation into the atmosphere. As the transfer of nuclear fuel to Bushehr’s reactor was completed with no Israeli attack, observers were surprised.

However, it now appears an attack may actually have been launched by Israel last year—with continuing impact on Iran today.

Indications are the Israelis may have quietly extracted from their quiver of options on how to setback Tehran’s nuclear program a “computer-transmitted disease.” And, like a sexually transmitted one, this “cyber super weapon” is a “gift” that keeps on giving.

In June 2010, a Belarus security firm identified existence of a very mysterious computer worm known as “Stuxnet.” Now dubbed the “malware of the century,” it was designed to infiltrate industrial control systems. Accessing its target, the worm can then spy, reprogram or sabotage a system and the equipment it operates.

Stuxnet is very complex, making identification of its architect extremely difficult—if not impossible. However, some indicators suggest an Israeli connection.

• An individual or group would be hard-pressed to design such complex malware. Thus, state support was involved.

• While most advanced nations air concerns about cyber wars of the future, few have taken the threat as seriously as Israel. Its Unit 8200 is a highly secretive cyber-warfare group established within its intelligence services that works not only on defending against cyber attacks but launching them as well.

• As of August 2010, of nine countries hit by Stuxnet, the country most adversely impacted was Iran—i.e., 60% of all infected computers worldwide are located there.

• A New York Times report suggests an Israeli fingerprint exists deep within the malware’s code. In trying to peel back Stuxnet’s complexities, the word “Myrtus” appears. Debate continues as to this word’s significance but one possibility is a biblical reference to the Book of Esther. Esther’s birth name was “Hadassah,” meaning “myrtle”—an evergreen shrub of the genus Myrtus, native to the Mediterranean region. A Jewish orphan, Esther was later taken by a Persian king—not knowing her ethnicity—to become his queen. Risking death, she subsequently revealed to the king she was a Jew in a courageous effort to prevent a campaign to exterminate all Jews in Persia. She succeeded as the Jews launched a pre-emptive attack against their enemies. While some experts contend “Myrtus” is an Israeli calling card intended to cause the Iranians to question the ability to control their own nuclear program, others contend it was planted as misinformation.

It is uncertain when this cyber attack was first launched. There are time stamps on pieces of the code suggesting it was created in early 2009. While the worm may have been released then, it probably was programmed with a time-delay feature—allowing it to infect as many Iranian systems as possible before being activated to do its damage. And, it was in late 2009 the Iranians began encountering problems with their centrifuges, used to enrich uranium, at their main nuclear facility at Natanz.

In the aftermath of Israel’s 2007 air strike against Syria’s nuclear facility, Damascus maintained a low profile—failing to even challenge Israel for violating its airspace—so as not to focus further attention on its nuclear program.

Similarly, although Iran is under cyber attack, Tehran maintains a low profile for this reason as well as to avoid giving credibility to Israel’s cyber-warfare capabilities. Nonetheless, Stuxnet’s impact must be significant as it appears to have generated a schizophrenic Iranian government’s witch hunt for nuclear spies, as evidenced by several recently announced arrests.

The potential dangers from industrial control system failures triggered by malware are endless. On September 9, however, we got a taste of this potential from an accidental failure of a control system monitoring pressure in a gas pipeline under a residential community in San Bruno, Calif. The resulting explosion and fireball claimed eight lives, destroying dozens of homes.

More than 2,500 years ago, the brilliant Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu emphasized the importance of the element of surprise in warfare. The cyber attack against Iran undoubtedly caught the Iranians by surprise. Regardless of who designed Stuxnet, Sun Tzu would be proud of the architect.


Lieutenant Colonel James Zumwalt is a retired Marine infantry officer who served in the Vietnam war, the 1989 intervention into Panama and Desert Storm. An author, speaker and business executive, he also currently heads a security consulting firm named after his father -- Admiral Zumwalt & Consultants, Inc. He has also been cited in numerous other books and publications for unique insights based on his research on the Vietnam war, North Korea (a country he has visited ten times and about which he is able to share some very telling observations) and Desert Storm.

8/22/2010

Issa: Tea party activists aren't outraged enough

Via-Mercury News

By JULIET WILLIAMS

SAN DIEGO—Tea party activists who have protested government spending and pushed for the GOP to nominate more conservative candidates this year aren't outraged enough about government malfeasance and excessive spending, Rep. Darrell Issa of California said Saturday.

The Republican congressman told delegates at the state party's meeting in San Diego that the GOP hasn't been vigilant enough about reining in waste, fraud and abuse, including excessive spending during Republican administrations such as that of President George W. Bush.

"We have to say to the tea party: You're not strident enough, you're not angry enough and the government has gone far enough," Issa said.

"We've already squandered the legacy of our parents."

Issa, the senior Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and one of the most vocal critics of the Obama administration, said the GOP must be willing to tear itself apart and rebuild, stronger and more focused on core constitutional issues.

He predicted Republicans would retake the House in November, but said holding a majority is not enough, noting that government spending has continued to grow during the last two decades.

Issa called for the appointment of more inspectors to audit spending and greater transparency about where federal dollars are going.

"I'm ashamed that Republicans were not zealots about flaws in government that were pointed out by inspector generals," he added.

Issa spoke to a crowd of about 100 on the final night of the GOP's twice yearly meeting.

8/19/2010

Patronizing lectures to Israel not helping peace effort


Via-Washington Post

By GEORGE F. WILL

JERUSALEM — In the intifada that began in 2000, Palestinian terrorism killed more than 1,000 Israelis. As a portion of U.S. population, that would be 42,000, approaching the toll of America's eight years in Vietnam. During the onslaught, which began 10 Septembers ago, Israeli parents sending two children to a school would put them on separate buses to decrease the chance that neither would return for dinner. Surely most Americans can imagine, even if their tone-deaf leaders can not, how grating it is when those leaders lecture Israel on the need to take "risks for peace."

During Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's July visit to Washington, Barack Obama praised him as "willing to take risks for peace." There was a time when that meant swapping "land for peace" - Israel sacrificing something tangible and irrecoverable, strategic depth, in exchange for something intangible and perishable, promises of diplomatic normality.

Strategic depth matters in a nation where almost everyone is a soldier, so society cannot function for long with the nation fully mobilized. Also, before the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel within the borders established by the 1949 armistice was in one place just nine miles wide, a fact that moved George W. Bush to say: In Texas we have driveways that long. Israel exchanged a lot of land to achieve a chilly peace with Egypt, yielding the Sinai, which is almost three times larger than Israel and was 89 percent of the land captured in the process of repelling the 1967 aggression.

The intifada was launched by the late Yasser Arafat - terrorist and Nobel Peace Prize winner - after the July 2000 Camp David meeting, during which then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered to cede control of all of Gaza and more than 90 percent of the West Bank, with small swaps of land to accommodate the growth of Jerusalem suburbs just across the 1949 armistice line.

Israelis are famously fractious, but the intifada produced among them a consensus that the most any government of theirs could offer without forfeiting domestic support is less than any Palestinian interlocutor would demand. Furthermore, the intifada was part of a pattern. As in 1936 and 1947, talk about partition prompted Arab violence.

In 1936, when the British administered Palestine, the Peel Commission concluded that there was "an irrepressible conflict" - a phrase coined by an American historian to describe the U.S. Civil War - "between two national communities within the narrow bounds of one small country." And: "Neither of the two national ideals permits" a combination "in the service of a single state." The commission recommended "a surgical operation" - partition. What followed was the Arab Revolt of 1936 to 1939.

On Nov. 29, 1947, the U.N. recommended a partition plan. Israel accepted the recommendation. On Nov. 30, Israel was attacked.

Palestine has a seemingly limitless capacity for eliciting nonsense from afar, as it did recently when Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron referred to Gaza as a "prison camp." In a sense it is, but not in the sense Cameron intended. His implication was that Israel is the cruel imprisoner. Gaza's actual misfortune is to be under the iron fist of Hamas, a terrorist organization.

In May, a flotilla launched from Turkey approached Gaza in order to provoke a confrontation with Israel, which, like Egypt, administers a blockade to prevent arms from reaching Hamas. The flotilla's pretense was humanitarian relief for Gaza - where the infant mortality rate is lower and life expectancy is higher than in Turkey.

Israelis less than 50 years old have no memory of their nation within the 1967 borders set by the 1949 armistice that ended the War of Independence. The rest of the world seems to have no memory at all concerning the intersecting histories of Palestine and the Jewish people.

The creation of Israel did not involve the destruction of a Palestinian state, there having been no such state since the Romans arrived. And if the Jewish percentage of the world's population were today what it was when the Romans ruled Palestine, there would be 200 million Jews. After a uniquely hazardous passage through two millennia without a homeland, there are 13 million Jews.

In the 62 years since this homeland was founded on one-sixth of 1 percent of the land of what is carelessly and inaccurately called "the Arab world," Israelis have never known an hour of real peace. Patronizing American lectures on the reality of risks and the desirableness of peace, which once were merely fatuous, are now obscene

6/14/2010

Thomas, Turkey, and the Liberation of Israel

Via-National Review Online

by Victor Davis Hanson

It is hard to become much more influential than the doyen of the White House press corps, who is given a ceremonial front-rows seat at press briefings and press conferences. So when Helen Thomas suggested that the Israelis should leave their country and “go home” to Poland and Germany, this was not some obscure, eccentric anti-Semite, but a liberal insider who has come to enjoy iconic status and a sense of exemption from criticism.

Note that Ms. Thomas did not call for just a West Bank free of Jews. And she did not just wish for the elimination of the nation of Israel itself. Rather, Thomas envisions the departure of Israelis to the sites of the major death camps seven decades ago where six million Jews were gassed.

Turkey’s role in aiding and abetting the flotilla, and its subsequent anti-Israeli outbursts, were excessive even by the often sick standards of the Middle East — but not exactly new. State-run Turkish television has aired virulent anti-Semitic dramas like the 2006 Valley of the Wolves, in which a Jewish doctor harvests organs from captured Iraqi civilians. Former Turkish prime minister Necmettin Erbakan once claimed that the Jews had instigated World War I in order to create Israel. Israel, Erbakan further asserted, in full-blown Hitlerian prose, was a “disease” and a “bacteria” that needed to be eradicated. The current prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, talks of sending in the Turkish fleet to confront the Israeli blockade, says he is sick of Israeli lies, and warns that his new Turkey is not “a young and rootless nation,” as Israel presumably is (note the code word “rootless”). So speaks our NATO partner and E.U. wannabe. This week, in reaction to criticism from the West, Erdogan labeled such concerns “dirty propaganda” — note well, not just propaganda but a “dirty” sort.

In an odd way, Thomas’s sick suggestions and Turkey’s new Islamist and vehemently anti-Israel foreign policy will have a liberating effect on Israel. After all, if the ceremonial head of the White House press corps wants Israel’s citizens either gone or dead, there is a legitimate suspicion that things are not quite right in the capital of Israel’s staunchest ally. And if the most secular, democratic, and pro-Western Muslim country in the Middle East wishes to pick a fight to prove its Muslim fides, then there is not much hope that Israel is going to win over anyone else in that region.

Anti-Semitism as displayed by both Thomas and Turkey’s leaders is not predicated on criticizing Israel, much less disagreeing with its foreign policy. Instead, it hinges upon focusing singularly on Israeli behavior, and applying a standard to it that is never extended to any other nation.

6/09/2010

Jews in Oz: How Did We Get Here, Dorothy?

Via-David Horowitz's News Reel Blog

by Mike Lumish

If people had told me a year or two ago that I would be participating on a blog associated with David Horowitz, I would have told them that they were out of their bleeding minds. I’m a liberal, for chrissake. I just spent almost the last ten years hatin’ on the Bush administration, marching against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, phone banking for MoveOn.org, donating money to the Gore campaign, the Kerry campaign, the Obama campaign. I am in favor of a woman’s right to choose, in favor of Gay rights, in favor of governmental regulation of polluting industries, and would prefer to see a more equitable distribution of wealth via the tax code. Heck, I even live in the Haight-Ashbury section of San Francisco, the bluest neighborhood in the bluest city of a dominantly blue state.

And, yet, here I am....

Read entire article here

6/08/2010

If Israel Is Not Evil, the World Is in Big Trouble

Via-Townhall

by Dennis Prager

With the exception of the United States, nearly all the world's nations; newspapers, radio and TV news stations; the United Nations; and the world's Leftist academics and organizations have condemned Israel over the Gaza flotilla incident. The characterizations of the Jewish state range from a society so evil that it should not be allowed to exist to a villainous nation that is responsible for a) the suffering of millions of innocent Palestinian men, women and children; b) the lack of Mideast peace; therefore c) the Muslim world's anger at the West; and therefore d) Islamic terrorism itself.

Let's hope the world is right.
Though Israel is a thriving liberal democracy for all its citizens, including the one out of five that is Arab (83 percent of whom are Muslim), with an independent judiciary and press; though it signed an agreement establishing an independent Palestinian state; though it returned to Egypt every inch of the Sinai Peninsula, a land mass larger than Israel itself with major oil reserves -- the world deems Israel a villain.

Let's hope the world is right.

Though Hamas runs a theocratic police state based on torture and terror, with no freedom of speech, no freedom for any religious expression outside of radical Islam, seeks to annihilate the Jewish state, and its state-controlled media depict Israelis and Jews as worthy of death, the world sees Israel, not Hamas, as the villain.

Let's hope the world is right.

Here is a random sampling of world reactions:

6/06/2010

Double Standard Watch: Singling out Israel for 'international investigation'

Via-Jerusalem Post

Alan M. Dershowitz

In a world in which North Korea sinks a South Korean naval vessel killing dozens, Iran arms Islamic terrorists, who kill hundreds, Russia bombs Chechnya, killing thousands, and the United States and Great Britain, while targeting al Qaida and Taliban, kill an indeterminate number of civilians, only Israel is subjected to international "investigations" such as that conducted by Richard Goldstone and that being called for by the Security Council in the wake of the recent flotilla fiasco.

Why only Israel? Why is the United Nations silent about other situations that cry out for international investigations? Surely it's not because what Israel did was worse than what other member nations have done. Certainly it's not because Israel lacks self-criticism or mechanisms for internal investigation. Plainly it's not because the other "offenders" were provoked, while Israel was unprovoked.

There is only one answer - because Israel has long been singled out for public scrutiny and opprobrium by the United Nations in particular and the international community in general.

This is not to say that Israel has always been blameless. It foolishly took the bait and allowed itself to be provoked into overreacting to a well planned provocation by so-called "humanitarians," who love only those who hate the Jewish state. The best proof that the flotilla had little to do with providing humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza and everything to do with breaking Israel's entirely lawful military blockade of a terrorist enclave, is Hamas' refusal to accept the food and medicine that Israel removed from the captured boats. The leaders of the flotilla admitted that their object was the same as Hamas' - not to provide humanitarian assistance to Gaza but rather to break the military blockade that is designed to keep rockets and other anti-personnel weapons from the hands of Hamas terrorists.

Israel should have been smarter in its efforts to enforce its blockade, but it did nothing illegal - and what it did do certainly doesn't warrant being singled out for the stigma of an international investigation.

If the United Nations is to get into the business of ordering and conducting international investigations, it must establish neutral and objective criteria for when such an investigation is warranted. These criteria must be equally applicable to all nations, and not merely to the Jewish nation.

Primary among the criteria must be "the worst first." Under that rule, investigations must be conducted in the order of the seriousness of the offense, not the unpopularity of the offender. Israel's actions in enforcing its blockade ranks fairly low on the pecking order of offenses, compared to those that have never been subjected to a mandated international investigation. Until and unless North Korea, Iran, Russia and other nations are required to undergo international scrutiny, the demand that Israel do so is illegitimate.

The second neutral criteria should be the capacity of the accused nation to investigate itself and to be subjected to domestic scrutiny and criticism. Here too Israel fares must better than most. It has an activist Supreme Court, a free and aggressive press and a responsive political system. It doesn't need dictatorial tyrannies telling it how to defend its citizens.

For international law to have any credibility, it must be applied neutrally, objectively and fairly to all nations. Singling out Israel for special scrutiny and investigation, while far more serious offenders and offenses are ignored, is incompatible with the rule of law.

6/04/2010

Toon

Liz Cheney statement

Via-Keep America Safe

“Yesterday, President Obama said the Israeli action to stop the flotilla bound for the Gaza Strip was “tragic.” What is truly tragic is that President Obama is perpetuating Israel’s enemies’ version of events. The Israeli government has imposed a blockade around Gaza because Hamas remains committed to Israel’s destruction, refusing to recognize Israel’s right to exist and using territory under their control to launch attacks against Israeli civilians. The Israeli blockade of Gaza, in order to prevent the re-arming of Hamas, is in full compliance with international law. Had the Turkish flotilla truly been interested in providing humanitarian aid to Gaza, they would have accepted the Israeli offer to off-load their supplies peacefully at the Israeli port of Haifa for transport into Gaza. President Obama is contributing to the isolation of Israel, and sending a clear signal to the Turkish-Syrian-Iranian axis that their methods for ostracizing Israel will succeed, and will be met by no resistance from America. There is no middle ground here. Either the United States stands with the people of Israel in the war against radical Islamic terrorism or we are providing encouragement to Israel’s enemies—and our own. Keep America Safe calls on President Obama to reverse his present course and support the state of Israel immediately and unequivocally.”

Liz Cheney

Lincoln at Gaza

Via-The Weekly Standard

Like our own constitution, international law is not a suicide pact.

BY Gabriel Schoenfeld

Is the conflict between Israel and Hamas-ruled Gaza between two belligerents, or is Israel facing an internal insurgency? The distinction is important for evaluating the legality of the blockade that Israel is determined to enforce to stop Hamas from receiving arms from countries like Iran, determined to wipe it from the map. Blockades on the high seas are lawful under customary international law, but only under certain conditions: one of them is that there be an armed conflict or state of war between the blockading and the blockaded party.

Is Israel in a state of war with Hamas-ruled Gaza? Israel would be loath to consider itself so, for that would be tantamount to acknowledging that Gaza is the equivalent of a legitimate belligerent with all attending rights and powers under international law.

Sorting this out in the Wall Street Journal, Eric Posner contends that Israel's blockade is nonetheless legal and founded on precedent. A chapter from American history provides one of the keys. During our Civil War, Abraham Lincoln imposed a blockade on the Confederacy “while at the same time maintaining that the Confederacy was not a sovereign state but an agent of insurrection.” Lincoln’s contention was then backed up by the Supreme Court in what Posner describes as “an ambiguous opinion that held that an armed conflict existed, even though one side was not a sovereign state.” A blockade of the Confederacy was legal even if the blockaded party still did not enjoy the privileges of a belligerent power. The opinion, writes Posner, “suggests a certain latitude for countries to use blockades against internal as well as external enemies.”

The Convenient Villain

Via-Townhall

by Jonah Goldberg

On May 29, two days before Israel's botched raid of six "humanitarian" ships bound for Gaza, Robert Naiman, the policy director of something called "Just Foreign Policy," wrote an item on the Huffington Post headlined "Gaza Freedom Flotilla Shows Awesome Power of Nonviolent Resistance."

Naiman waxed lyrical about how the moral authority of nonviolence had compelled Turkish-controlled Cyprus to help the flotilla while Greek-controlled Cyprus had allegedly caved to Israeli pressure in refusing to help the heirs of Gandhi (it couldn't have been because the Turks were up to no good).

"All this," Naiman gushed, "and the main confrontation between the Israeli occupation authorities and the Gaza Freedom Flotilla has not yet begun."

Roughly 48 hours later, the "main confrontation" unfolded. In fairness, the majority of "peace activists" on the ships were nonviolent, offering passive resistance. But on the last boat Israelis boarded, the supposed disciples of peace attacked the Israeli commandos. These new Gandhians beat the Israelis with metal bars and even threw one Israeli overboard.

Funny, I'm no expert, but that's not how Gandhi behaved in the movie. Maybe there was a sequel with Chuck Norris as the Mahatma? "Gandhi's back, and this time it's personal!"

6/03/2010

The $64,000 Question Is...

Via-Captain Capitalism

Will people now change their minds and realize this was a cowardly attempt by terrorists, guised under noble, humanitarian clothing to smuggle weapons in (and thus in part admit there is now a desire of lefter leaning elements to combined forces with terrorism) and therefore condemn it

or

Will they refuse to admit they're wrong and tacitly support terrorism because their leftist ideology blinds them from any kind of capacity for intellectual honesty

or

They will cowardly claim this report is false and that the Israeli's made it up.

It is a very important question because it's going to test whether people (primarily of the lefter persuasion) can set aside their ideologies and as adults acknowledge they were wrong and condemn terrorism or if their ideology is so strong they will still maintain their positions and thus tacitly APPROVE OF TERRORISM.

I shall now sit back and watch this unfold like a movie, much like a did the housing crash, without an utter care or concern because simply it's a lost cause and life is too short to worry about things you don't control. So, enjoy the decline!